Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Alternative payments: Will history repeat itself? | VentureBeat

Alternative payments: Will history repeat itself?

July 13, 2009 Ron Hirson

boku-team-e28093-global-mobile-payment-leaders1With the phenomenal growth in social networks, online games and virtual worlds, we’re seeing a shift in monetization away from traditional advertising and credit card commerce. Virtual goods and currencies across these platforms, as well as gaming models like free-to-play, are opening a whole new world of things to sell and ways to pay for them. Facebook alone is calculated to have had $500 million of virtual goods and currencies run across its platform as people buy everything from birthday cakes to godfather favor points for their friends and for themselves. In addition to the usual means of paying for these virtual goodies, we’re seeing a host of other methods: Cross-sell exchanges (example: sign up for Netflix, get points/etc.), time barters (example: Fill out a survey), and even new credit sources (example: Charge to your mobile or home phone).

So who are going to become the leading companies providing these new alternative payment methods? Here at Boku, we’re building a new payments service focused on mobile, and we’ve been looking at past winners such as PayPal and BillMeLater to see what key lessons we can learn from their previous success. We talk about these key learnings below and then consider what has changed since then as a guide in predicting the next leading payment platforms.

Key learnings:

Be flexible. When PayPal launched, their original vision was to make money on the float created by allowing people to send money to each other safely over email (technically it started out over PalmPilots, but that’s another story). They shifted to focus on merchants on eBay and other P2P commerce sites and built out the operational capabilities to serve those merchants over time (like its forthcoming Adaptive Payments API, opening up parts of their platform to developers). Some shifts in alternative payments are already happening as lead-generation sites (offers) are starting to add more and more direct payment methods and give them greater web page real estate (pixels).

Ride a wave. PayPal’s was eBay auctions and the need for a trusted intermediary to handle the transfer of funds from buyer to seller. BillMeLater leveraged a mature ecommerce environment and offered a product that reached a segment of customers that either didn’t want to provide financially identifiable info or preferred to buy with credit. (As a disclaimer, BOKU’s CEO, Mark Britto, was an early investor in and board member of BillMeLater). Today virtual goods and currencies have a unique combination of low price-points and near-zero cost-of-goods-sold (COGS), enabling everything from a simple survey to a mobile payment as means to pay.

Reduce friction. Once you have a PayPal account it’s easier to “checkout,” especially on a site you haven’t shopped at before, than entering in your credit card information. BillMeLater was able to tap into a cohort of customers for merchants who still are reluctant to give up financial information over the web. Amazon and other ecommerce sites saw a 5-7 percent lift in customers transacting after adding BillMeLaters payment service. Today, mobile payments are seeing huge revenue growth because they are more convenient than other payment methods online. This is because you either 1) have a phone but not a credit card or bank account (as is the case in emerging countries like India, where only one in three people has a bank account), or 2) it’s just easier to enter your phone number than credit card number, address, zip, CVV number.

Go big. PayPal focused relentlessly on removing barriers to adoption - and they paid high (reportedly between $4-10) acquisition costs for each customer. They invested $100-plus million to grow their market and reaped the rewards of network effect they created. Facebook has the clearest opportunity to be the next network of customers, though others are working on this as well.

Invest in security early. PayPal reportedly had over 50 percent of its original 650 employees working on fraud prevention and customer support. It’s rumored that early fines and fraudulent activity have now brought their CS and fraud team to 2000 or more. Mobile payments, by design, require that you have your phone in order to complete a transaction and since it’s almost always in your possession (or more importantly, you realize as soon as it’s not), have significantly less “stolen identity” fraud than in traditional payment methods such as credit cards. However, all alternative payment methods, including mobile, are going to have to invest in technology and people for fraud prevention as success will bring unwanted attention from the same people that have their sights on PayPal and BillMeLater.

What’s changed?

Focus on merchants before consumers. Open platforms and ease of integration allow merchants (app developers and game publishers) to integrate payments services very easily. A simple iframe with few lines of code are all that are needed. Payments companies don’t have to go straight to consumer. PayPal kick-started their network effect by buying customers, initially for a $10 bonus for each one referred, and they’re now turning more deliberately towards merchants with the Adaptive API. BillMeLater had the benefit of appearing in the checkout flow and either did rev-shares or direct payments to merchants. By existing as an option in the checkout flow, payment companies can skip the higher direct-to-consumer acquisition fees, and focus on those who have intent to purchase instead of hoping to convert registrants to transacting customers.

Payment variety. PayPal does offer the ability to pay with your credit card or bank account, while BillMeLater is essentially a credit application, but what we’re seeing with the alternative payments companies today, especially amongst the “offer” companies, is the aggregation of multiple payment methods. SuperRewards, Gambit, and Offerpal now offer credit cards, mobile phone payments, offers, PayPal, etc. and combinations of the above. The ease of integrating these companies means that the developers can focus on what they do best and still offer all types of payment methods to optimize revenue. But variety is leading to clutter and poor user experience and payment aggregators will focus in the coming quarters on cleaning up the interface to deal with the issues that come about from the paradox of choice.

Ease of integration. When PayPal for checkout arrived it was arguably the easiest of all the payment integration methods (versus PaymentTech, etc.). However, this now seems complex compared to the simple addition of an iframe and a few lines of code to confirm transactions. This ease of integration means that developers are adding, duplicating and swapping payment methods often. Some game developers have four of the top payment aggregators running at once and display them in tabs, for customers to switch between – increasing revenue dramatically. This ease of integration is double-edged. While it has been in our favor recently, we’re aware that this means if we aren’t delivering results, we will be swapped out.

Global faster. Social networks are global. Publishers of apps and games are global. They want domestic and global solutions at the same time. It’s become clear that advertising and credit cards aren’t the only solution to monetizing these services, and in some cases the new payment methods are better able to make money both in North America and Western Europe (the head) as well as emerging markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America (the tail). Boku is live in 50 countries – we take a ‘head and tail’ approach to international reach. An app’s next fan base may just be in Thailand, Malaysia, or Turkey. PayPal got global reach later in their evolution mainly because, at its inception, e-commerce revenue was only coming from 8-10 places.

What’s next?

Based on what we’re hearing from working directly with online games and social applications and in partnering with payments aggregators, it’s clear the industry is shifting from the “revenue at all costs” phase to the “optimization and analytics” phase of monetization. Great apps and gaming companies that are already making $1-30 million are already hiring more web monetization and merchandising experts and user experience, reach and results are being rightfully questioned. Merchants will be looking closely at payments companies and their ability to provide long-term operational value. The rest of 2009 will clearly identify leaders, while others will fail to see 2010. We at Boku are working hard to take these lessons to heart and do our best to become a standard in mobile payments.


Sunday, July 12, 2009

For Fun And Profit Books

HOW TO RAISE CHILDREN FOR FUN AND PROFIT


Thursday, July 9, 2009

Amazon Killing Mobile Apps That Use Its Data

by MG Siegler on July 7, 2009

picture-45Well, this sucks. I had not yet gotten around to downloading the new Delicious Library iPhone app, which I heard was great. And now I can’t because the developer had to remove it from the App Store. Why? Because of Amazon.

A recent change to Amazon’s Product Advertising API means that apps like Delicious Library are being restricted from using it, according to Alan Quatermain. And what’s really perplexing is that this change apparently only matters on mobile devices, meaning bye bye to an iPhone app that took its developers 8 months to build.

Here’s the official wording that killed the app:

You will not, without our express prior written approval requested via this link , use any Product Advertising Content on or in connection with any site or application designed or intended for use with a mobile phone or other handheld device.

Developer Wil Shipley tried to reach out to Amazon to see about getting permission, but Amazon apparently said no exceptions were being made. Not only that, “they [Amazon] told me to remove it today, or they’d shut me down,” Shipley tweeted out.

And this data is crucial to Delicious Library, because it’s how it pulls its product information. So it won’t be back unless Amazon changes that rule, which it doesn’t appear to be ready to do anytime soon.

It would seem that Amazon only wants you to be able to access its product data through its own mobile site and apps. But that’s a problem because, as Quatermain points out, the Amazon iPhone app isn’t even available in places like the UK.

Yeah. This is fairly ridiculous.

Update: As Rod points out in the comments, this seems to be related to similar action Amazon was taking nearly 2 years ago against mobile web startups. But here’s why this remains utterly ridiculous — if not more so — just read what Amazon told us at the time:

2/ Now with regards to just ECS, we do limit access by some mobile-focused companies to just that service. Its says in our license agreement for that service that developers must first get permission from Amazon Web Services prior to using Amazon ECS in connection with any handheld, mobile, or mobile phone application (see 5.1.4 here) . The reason is that it’s very early days in the mobile space and Amazon.com is still thinking through how to best serve customers who want to use mobile devices to shop on Amazon.com. At this point, we’re being cautious about exposing our catalog data for use in the mobile space.

Amazon tried to make it sound like they were just in the process of figuring everything out and then would come up with a way to “best serve customers who want to use mobile devices to shop on Amazon.com” Uh yeah, it’s been almost 2 years.

And again, Shipley did ask for permission, and was flat-out denied.


Amazon Killing Mobile Apps That Use Its Data

by MG Siegler on July 7, 2009

picture-45Well, this sucks. I had not yet gotten around to downloading the new Delicious Library iPhone app, which I heard was great. And now I can’t because the developer had to remove it from the App Store. Why? Because of Amazon.

A recent change to Amazon’s Product Advertising API means that apps like Delicious Library are being restricted from using it, according to Alan Quatermain. And what’s really perplexing is that this change apparently only matters on mobile devices, meaning bye bye to an iPhone app that took its developers 8 months to build.

Here’s the official wording that killed the app:

You will not, without our express prior written approval requested via this link , use any Product Advertising Content on or in connection with any site or application designed or intended for use with a mobile phone or other handheld device.

Developer Wil Shipley tried to reach out to Amazon to see about getting permission, but Amazon apparently said no exceptions were being made. Not only that, “they [Amazon] told me to remove it today, or they’d shut me down,” Shipley tweeted out.

And this data is crucial to Delicious Library, because it’s how it pulls its product information. So it won’t be back unless Amazon changes that rule, which it doesn’t appear to be ready to do anytime soon.

It would seem that Amazon only wants you to be able to access its product data through its own mobile site and apps. But that’s a problem because, as Quatermain points out, the Amazon iPhone app isn’t even available in places like the UK.

Yeah. This is fairly ridiculous.

Update: As Rod points out in the comments, this seems to be related to similar action Amazon was taking nearly 2 years ago against mobile web startups. But here’s why this remains utterly ridiculous — if not more so — just read what Amazon told us at the time:

2/ Now with regards to just ECS, we do limit access by some mobile-focused companies to just that service. Its says in our license agreement for that service that developers must first get permission from Amazon Web Services prior to using Amazon ECS in connection with any handheld, mobile, or mobile phone application (see 5.1.4 here) . The reason is that it’s very early days in the mobile space and Amazon.com is still thinking through how to best serve customers who want to use mobile devices to shop on Amazon.com. At this point, we’re being cautious about exposing our catalog data for use in the mobile space.

Amazon tried to make it sound like they were just in the process of figuring everything out and then would come up with a way to “best serve customers who want to use mobile devices to shop on Amazon.com” Uh yeah, it’s been almost 2 years.

And again, Shipley did ask for permission, and was flat-out denied.


Amazon nixes Twitter, Facebook affiliate commission » Adotas

Amazon nixes Twitter, Facebook affiliate commission

Written on
July 7th 2009
Author
by Edward Barrera 
Feed
   XML Feed

affiliate11.jpgADOTAS — The e-retailer has made a nice living off affiliate members who have been a large commission-only salesforce for a long time.

But the love doesn’t go both ways. Joshua Odmark, a technology consultant at Simply Ideas LLC and who also blogs for Performance Marketing Blog, found that out recently. He wrote a recommendation and product review with a link from an Amazon link page — except he did it through Twitter and Facebook. Amazon later killed a commission, pointing to its TOS, which says that ‘“Your site” means any site that you will link to the Amazon Site (and which you will identify in your Program application)”

But as Joshua notes:
“If you really think about it, what is the difference between posting a link on my blog, which is read by subscribers who are interested in what I have to say, as compared to the followers who are following me because they are interested in what I have to say? Seems to me a simple matter of semantics. Oh, and that whole character limit thing.”

As states start to squeeze e-retailers like Amazon (forget the bite from other countries), I find the company’s position odd. It’s losing money from affiliates and penny-pinching its salesforce instead of expanding with the different ways the Internet allows users to find and buy products. But I guess since Amazon’s profits have doubled to $207 million from last year, based mostly around the Kindle, it couldn’t care less about the people who helped it.


Amazon nixes Twitter, Facebook affiliate commission » Adotas

Amazon nixes Twitter, Facebook affiliate commission

Written on
July 7th 2009
Author
by Edward Barrera 
Feed
   XML Feed

affiliate11.jpgADOTAS — The e-retailer has made a nice living off affiliate members who have been a large commission-only salesforce for a long time.

But the love doesn’t go both ways. Joshua Odmark, a technology consultant at Simply Ideas LLC and who also blogs for Performance Marketing Blog, found that out recently. He wrote a recommendation and product review with a link from an Amazon link page — except he did it through Twitter and Facebook. Amazon later killed a commission, pointing to its TOS, which says that ‘“Your site” means any site that you will link to the Amazon Site (and which you will identify in your Program application)”

But as Joshua notes:
“If you really think about it, what is the difference between posting a link on my blog, which is read by subscribers who are interested in what I have to say, as compared to the followers who are following me because they are interested in what I have to say? Seems to me a simple matter of semantics. Oh, and that whole character limit thing.”

As states start to squeeze e-retailers like Amazon (forget the bite from other countries), I find the company’s position odd. It’s losing money from affiliates and penny-pinching its salesforce instead of expanding with the different ways the Internet allows users to find and buy products. But I guess since Amazon’s profits have doubled to $207 million from last year, based mostly around the Kindle, it couldn’t care less about the people who helped it.


Monday, July 6, 2009

Amazon adding in-book ads to Kindle?

Amazon adding in-book ads to Kindle?

By Jason
Created Jul 6 2009 - 10:51am

A pair of recent patent applications suggest Amazon.com is planning to introduce advertisements to content optimized for its Kindle ereader platform. United States Patent Application 20090171751 [1], detailing "On-Demand Generating E-Book Content with Advertising," outlines "a method of providing fixed computer-displayable content in response to a consumer request for content," while Patent Application 2009171750 [2], "Incorporating Advertising in On-Demand Generated Content," outlines a "system and a method of incorporating advertisements in on-demand printed content."

"While on-demand printing provides access to a wide variety of content, including out-of-print and/or rare documents, the content is fixed and, therefore, has not been adapted to modern marketing," the patents state. "In contrast, many Internet sites that publish content are able to do so profitably by displaying advertisements with the published content. Indeed, most content providers that host 'free' Internet sites are typically supported by advertisements. Of course, in regard to out-of-print or rare books, they typically do not include advertisements and, if they do, the advertisements are out of date and inapplicable... As part of printing documents in an on-demand fashion, the on-demand printed content provides the opportunity to incorporate advertisements, as well as other subject matter, in an on-demand printed document." However, that language is a little strange given that most books don't include advertisements, regardless of whether or not the title is in print.

For more on the Amazon patents:
- read this Slashdot article [3]

Related articles:
Amazon promises Kindle [4] content across more devices
Amazon to sell Kindle [5] ebooks via iPhone


Links:
[1] http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090171751%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090171751&RS=DN/20090171751
[2] http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090171750%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090171750&RS=DN/20090171750
[3] http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/2232256/Amazon-Wants-Patent-For-Inserting-Ads-Into-Books
[4] http://www.fiercemobilecontent.com/story/amazon-promises-kindle-content-across-more-devices/2009-06-16
[5] http://www.fiercemobilecontent.com/story/amazon-sell-kindle-e-books-iphone/2009-03-04


Amazon adding in-book ads to Kindle?

Amazon adding in-book ads to Kindle?

By Jason
Created Jul 6 2009 - 10:51am

A pair of recent patent applications suggest Amazon.com is planning to introduce advertisements to content optimized for its Kindle ereader platform. United States Patent Application 20090171751 [1], detailing "On-Demand Generating E-Book Content with Advertising," outlines "a method of providing fixed computer-displayable content in response to a consumer request for content," while Patent Application 2009171750 [2], "Incorporating Advertising in On-Demand Generated Content," outlines a "system and a method of incorporating advertisements in on-demand printed content."

"While on-demand printing provides access to a wide variety of content, including out-of-print and/or rare documents, the content is fixed and, therefore, has not been adapted to modern marketing," the patents state. "In contrast, many Internet sites that publish content are able to do so profitably by displaying advertisements with the published content. Indeed, most content providers that host 'free' Internet sites are typically supported by advertisements. Of course, in regard to out-of-print or rare books, they typically do not include advertisements and, if they do, the advertisements are out of date and inapplicable... As part of printing documents in an on-demand fashion, the on-demand printed content provides the opportunity to incorporate advertisements, as well as other subject matter, in an on-demand printed document." However, that language is a little strange given that most books don't include advertisements, regardless of whether or not the title is in print.

For more on the Amazon patents:
- read this Slashdot article [3]

Related articles:
Amazon promises Kindle [4] content across more devices
Amazon to sell Kindle [5] ebooks via iPhone


Links:
[1] http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090171751%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090171751&RS=DN/20090171751
[2] http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090171750%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090171750&RS=DN/20090171750
[3] http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/2232256/Amazon-Wants-Patent-For-Inserting-Ads-Into-Books
[4] http://www.fiercemobilecontent.com/story/amazon-promises-kindle-content-across-more-devices/2009-06-16
[5] http://www.fiercemobilecontent.com/story/amazon-sell-kindle-e-books-iphone/2009-03-04


Sunday, July 5, 2009

The Web Collapses Under The Weight Of Michael Jackson’s Death

by MG Siegler on June 25, 2009

michael-jacksonIn terms of well-known celebrities, few are bigger than Michael Jackson. Love him or hate him, pretty much everyone on the planet knows him. And that caused big problems for a lot of huge websites today with the news of his passing.

It was probably to be expected that Twitter would struggle as reportedly hundreds of thousands of tweets came in about Jackson in a very short amount of time. While I only got a couple actual Fail Whales, the site was really sucking wind for much of the hour that people were trying to get information about him. But Twitter was hardly the only site that was struggling.

Various reports had the AOL-owned TMZ, which broke the story, being down at multiple points throughout the ordeal. As a result, Perez Hilton’s hugely popular blog may have failed as people rushed there to try and confirm the news. Then it was the LATimes which had a report saying Jackson was only in a coma rather than dead, so people rushed there, and that site went down. (The LATimes eventually confirmed his passing.)

Meanwhile, CNN wasn’t down, but failed for another reason. CNN first said that Jackson was revived (see screenshot at the bottom) before going to the hospital.

picture-315

picture-57

picture-613

aaaa

cnnfup

Update: And just in case you didn’t believe this story is dominating the web right now, 9 of the 10 trending topics on Twitter are MJ-related. The lone exception is Ed McMahon, who also passed away two days ago. Meanwhile, Twitter search seems to be running about 20 minutes behind.

picture-910

Update 2: And here’s a tweet in kind of poor taste from Google Maps API team: “Sad about MJ & FF? Cheer up by watching some Geo I/O talks.” Way to promote yourself at the expense of someone’s death, Google. Classy.

picture-107

Update 3: And Google has apologized.

16

Update 4: And now Twitter has had to remove features like Search on its main site to stay afloat.

Update 5: Here’s a statement from AOL regarding TMZ during the news:

our internal records show that the site didn’t experience any interruption due to traffic. It’s possible that some people may have had trouble accessing the site due to local network issues, but TMZ was not down.


The Web Collapses Under The Weight Of Michael Jackson’s Death

by MG Siegler on June 25, 2009

michael-jacksonIn terms of well-known celebrities, few are bigger than Michael Jackson. Love him or hate him, pretty much everyone on the planet knows him. And that caused big problems for a lot of huge websites today with the news of his passing.

It was probably to be expected that Twitter would struggle as reportedly hundreds of thousands of tweets came in about Jackson in a very short amount of time. While I only got a couple actual Fail Whales, the site was really sucking wind for much of the hour that people were trying to get information about him. But Twitter was hardly the only site that was struggling.

Various reports had the AOL-owned TMZ, which broke the story, being down at multiple points throughout the ordeal. As a result, Perez Hilton’s hugely popular blog may have failed as people rushed there to try and confirm the news. Then it was the LATimes which had a report saying Jackson was only in a coma rather than dead, so people rushed there, and that site went down. (The LATimes eventually confirmed his passing.)

Meanwhile, CNN wasn’t down, but failed for another reason. CNN first said that Jackson was revived (see screenshot at the bottom) before going to the hospital.

picture-315

picture-57

picture-613

aaaa

cnnfup

Update: And just in case you didn’t believe this story is dominating the web right now, 9 of the 10 trending topics on Twitter are MJ-related. The lone exception is Ed McMahon, who also passed away two days ago. Meanwhile, Twitter search seems to be running about 20 minutes behind.

picture-910

Update 2: And here’s a tweet in kind of poor taste from Google Maps API team: “Sad about MJ & FF? Cheer up by watching some Geo I/O talks.” Way to promote yourself at the expense of someone’s death, Google. Classy.

picture-107

Update 3: And Google has apologized.

16

Update 4: And now Twitter has had to remove features like Search on its main site to stay afloat.

Update 5: Here’s a statement from AOL regarding TMZ during the news:

our internal records show that the site didn’t experience any interruption due to traffic. It’s possible that some people may have had trouble accessing the site due to local network issues, but TMZ was not down.